Mining Affairs in The Hand of Local Government: A Case Study of People’s Mining in Muara Enim Regency, Indonesia)


  • Sena Putra Prabujaya Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Bambang Supriyono Universitas Brawijaya
  • M.R. Khairul Muluk Universitas Brawijaya
  • Sujarwoto Sujarwoto Sujarwoto


Consequence, decentralization, mining affairs, Indonesia,


This study aimed to describe case study of people’s mining in Muara Enim Regency, South Sumatera, Indonesia. This was a case study research with descriptive method to explain the decentralization in mining affair located in Muara Enim regency. Data were collected from resources in the form of documents, archives, and phenomena whilst secondary data were collected from academic articles, Youtube, and online news. The positive impact of decentralization in people’s mining in Muara Enim Regency can be seen in economical aspect. Whereas the negative impact of decentralization in people’s mining are wider in three aspects, namely social, environmental, and human safety aspects. Government revisiting the mining regulations is needed to avoid further conflicts. Research on the key parameter on why a nation should do decentralization is still debated. The implementation of asymmetric decentralization in Indonesia since the new order era until after reform era brings an impact on how the quality of local governance may affect the result. While research on asymmetric decentralization has developed very significantly, only limited attention has been paid to the determinants of success, especially the role governance plays. 


D. Honig, “Information, power, and location: World Bank staff decentralization and aid project success,†Governance, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 749–769, 2020.

H. Cai and D. Treisman, “Did Government Decentralization Cause China’s Economic Miracle?,†World Polit., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 505–535, 2006.

T. R. Parry, “Achieving balance in decentralization: A case study of education decentralization in chile,†World Dev., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 211–225, 1997.

Z. Petak, “Politics of decentralization policy: Explaining the limited success of the Croatian case after 2001,†Polit. misao Äasopis za Politol., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 72–84, 2011.

D. A. Rondinelli, J. R. Nellis, and G. S. Cheema, “Decentralization in developing countries,†World Bank Staff Work. Pap., vol. 581, 1983.

A. Lawrence, “Energy decentralization in South Africa: Why past failure points to future success,†Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 120, p. 109659, 2020.

C. S. Fan, C. Lin, and D. Treisman, “Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world,†J. Public Econ., vol. 93, no. 1–2, pp. 14–34, 2009.

M. S. Grindle, “Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance,†Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance. pp. 1–228, 2009.

L. Secco, M. Favero, M. Masiero, and D. M. Pettenella, “Failures of political decentralization in promoting network governance in the forest sector: Observations from Italy,†Land use policy, vol. 62, pp. 79–100, Mar. 2017.

D. Conyers, “Decentralization and development: A review of the literature,†Public Adm. Dev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 187–197, 1984.

Pemerintah RI, “Undang-Undang (UU) Republik Indonesia No.22 tahun 1999 tentang Pemerintah Daerah,†Undang. Republik Indones., pp. 1–70, 1999.

P. R. Pemerintah RI, “UU nomor 9 tahun 2009,†p. 9, 2009.

G. Lele, “Asymmetric Decentralization and the Problem of Governance: The Case of Indonesia,†Asian Polit. Policy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 544–565, Oct. 2019.

P. R. Pemerintah RI, “UU tahun 2004,†p. 55, 2004.

K. Muluk, “Peta Konsep Desentralisasi dan Pemerintah Daerah,†Itpress, 2009.

S. N. Solechah, “Realisasi Desentralisasi Sektor Pertambangan,†Info Singk. Pemerintah. Dalam Negeri, vol. IV, no. 12, pp. 1–4, 2012.

R. L. Holzhacker, R. Wittek, and J. Woltjer, “Decentralization and Governance for Sustainable Society in Indonesia,†in Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia, Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 3–29.

V. R. Hadiz, “Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalist Perspectives,†Dev. Change, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 697–718, Sep. 2004.

R. K. Yin, Case study methods. American Psychological Association, 2012.

G. Oikonomou, “Decentralizing Governance,†Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. pp. 1–5, 2020.

W. Buli, “Strategi Pengendalian Kerusakan Lingkungan Melalui Pembenahan Kelembagaan Pertambangan Batubara Tanpa Izin Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Muara Enim Provinsi Sumatera Selatan’,†Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, 2018.

Muchamad Yusron, Bibiana W Lay, Anas M Fauzi, and Dwi Andreas Santosa, “Isolasi Dan Identifikasi Bakteri Pereduksi Sulfat Pada Area Pertambangan Batu Bara Muara Enim, Sumatera Selatan,†J. Mat. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2009.

W. Buli, S. Bakri, and I. G. Febryano, “Kelembagaan Pertambangan Batubara di Hutan Rakyat,†J. Sylva Lestari, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 81–90, 2018.